Skip to content

PPP & RTK

PPP & RTK

Abbreviations

  • SV: space vehicles or orbiting space vehicles
  • RTK: Real-Time Kinematic
  • PPP: Precise Point Positioning
  • PPP-RTK: Hybrid of PPP and RTK
  • CORS: Continuously Operating Reference Station
  • NRTK: Network RTK
  • OSR: Observation State Representation
  • SSR: State Space Representation

PPP

  • PPP achieves decimetre-level or better accuracy by leveraging corrections transmitted via satellite or the internet.
  • It utilises the SSR message format for efficient data transmission.
  • PPP is suitable for global applications due to its independence from regional base stations.
  • The primary limitation of PPP is its long convergence time, typically ranging from 5 to 30 minutes.
  • PPP primarily corrects for orbit errors, clock errors, and biases to achieve its positioning solution.
  • PPP offers a trade-off between accuracy and coverage, providing moderate accuracy over a wide area.
  • Variations like PPP-AR and A-PPP exist, offering enhanced accuracy or specialized capabilities.

RTK

  • RTK provides centimetre-level accuracy, achieving the highest precision among the discussed technologies.
  • RTK relies on the OSR message format, which requires a two-way communication channel between the base station and the rover.
  • The coverage area of RTK is limited to a short range (30-50 km) due to signal degradation with distance.
  • RTK boasts a near-instantaneous convergence time, typically under 5 seconds.
  • RTK corrects for various errors, including orbit errors, clock errors, bias, ionospheric delay, and tropospheric delay.
  • RTK is widely adopted in applications demanding high accuracy within a limited area, such as surveying and agriculture.
  • Developments like Network RTK (NRTK) address range limitations by incorporating networks of base stations.

PPP-RTK

  • PPP-RTK combines the strengths of PPP and RTK, offering high accuracy, global coverage, and fast convergence.
  • PPP-RTK achieves centimetre-level accuracy comparable to RTK while offering global coverage.
  • PPP-RTK employs the efficient SSR message format, enabling broadcast corrections and lower bandwidth requirements.
  • PPP-RTK utilises a network of CORS stations for precise atmospheric and clock corrections.
  • PPP-RTK converges significantly faster than PPP, typically within 1-10 minutes, and potentially seconds under ideal conditions.
  • It effectively corrects for orbit errors, clock errors, bias, ionospheric delay, and tropospheric delay, allowing for integer ambiguity resolution.
  • PPP-RTK gracefully degrades to standard PPP performance when outside the range of the CORS network.

Comparing RTK, PPP, and PPP-RTK

Feature RTK PPP PPP-RTK
Accuracy cm-level (up to 1 cm + 1 ppm) dm-level or better (less than 10 cm) cm-level, similar to RTK
Coverage Area Limited range (typically 30-50 km from the base station) Global Global with graceful degradation to standard PPP outside the range of the CORS network
Message Format OSR (Observation Space Representation) SSR (State Space Representation) SSR (State Space Representation)
Transmission Channel Two-way communication between base station and rover Corrections delivered via satellite or the internet Corrections broadcast to users, enabling a large number of users to connect simultaneously
Convergence Time Near-instantaneous (typically less than 5 seconds) Relatively long (typically 5-30 minutes) Fast (typically 1-10 minutes, potentially within seconds under ideal conditions)
Errors Solved Orbit errors, clock errors, bias, ionospheric delay, tropospheric delay Orbit errors, clock errors, bias Orbit errors, clock errors, bias, ionospheric delay, tropospheric delay, enabling integer ambiguity resolution
Key Strengths High accuracy, very fast convergence time Global coverage, no reliance on local base stations High accuracy, fast convergence time, global coverage, lower bandwidth requirements compared to RTK, graceful degradation outside CORS range
Key Limitations Limited range, high bandwidth requirements, reliance on local base stations Long convergence time, lower accuracy compared to RTK Still requires a CORS network (though less dense than RTK) and may degrade to standard PPP with increasing distance from CORS station

Difference in message format and resolved errors
Figure 1: Difference in message format and resolved errors