Localisation Techniques
Localisation Techniques
Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI)
- RSS: actual signal power strength recorded by the receiver, in decibel-milliwatts (dBm) or milliWatts(mW)
- Inverse proportionality between RSSI and transmitter-receiver distance
- RSSI: RSS indicated in arbitrary units
- RSSI localisation uses trilateration with at least 3 transmitters
- Advantages:
- Simple and cost-efficient due to low hardware requirements
- Disadvantages:
- Poor localization accuracy, especially in non-Line-of-Sight situations
- Additional signal attenuation from transmission through walls, obstacles, and multipath
- Potentially high fluctuation over time
Channel State Information (CSI)
- Captures amplitude and phase response across different frequencies
- Higher granularity than RSSI, gives more information to reduce multipath and provide more consistent measurements
- Overall higher localisation accuracy than RSSI
Fingerprinting/Scene Analysis
- Discrete estimation of user location based on grid
- Delicate balance between size of grid (and corresponding resolution), and the signal variation error
- Eg: impossible to estimate the correct point if the difference in RSSI values between each grid cell is less than the uncertainty range of the signal strength
- Offline phase: collect RSSI/CSI measurements to form a fingerprint map
- Online phase: compare real-time measurements with fingerprint map using algorithms:
- Probabilistic method: use histogram/kernel to calculate probability of receiver being in \(x\) grid of fingerprint map
- Artificial Neural Network: train a neural network (eg: Multi-Layer Perceptron) and provide real-time input with weights
- k-Nearest Neighbours: average nearest measurement patches to estimate the location
- Support Vector Machine (SVM): machine learning method applicable to indoor localisation
Angle of Arrival (AoA)
- Receiver's antennae array estimates the angle of transmitted signal by the time difference of arrival at individual parts of the array
- Advantages:
- Receiver location can be estimated with just 3 transmitters in a 3D environment
- Accurate estimation when transmitter-receiver distances are small
- Disadvantages:
- Slight error in angle calculation translates to huge error in position determination
- Thus not accurate at larger transmitter-receiver distances
- Line of Sight for angle calculation is hard to obtain due to indoor multipath effects
- Slight error in angle calculation translates to huge error in position determination
Time of Flight (ToF)
- Calculate physical transmitter-receiver distance using signal propagation time and speed of light
- Trilateration is used similar to RSSI to estimate position
- Requires strict time synchronisation between transmitter and receiver, such that timestamps may also be included in the signal
- Advantages:
- High sampling rate and large signal bandwidth increases the resolution of the position estimation
- Disadvantages:
- Highly sensitive to obstacles as they deflect the signals, resulting in a longer propagation time
Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA)
- Create hyperbolas between each pair of transmitters
- Intersection point of all hyperbolas represents the position estimate
- Ie: solve the system of hyperbola equations for X,Y,Z
- Difference between TDoA and ToF
- ToF uses absolute signal propagation time between each transmitter and receiver
- TDoA uses the difference between these propagation times
- Synchronisation is thus only necessary between transmitters (receiver error is common between transmitter pairs)
Return Time of Flight (RToF)
- Measures the round-trip signal propagation time from transmitter to receiver, and response signal from receiver to transmitter
- Difference between RToF and ToF
- Only moderate synchronisation between transmitter and receiver is required
- All factors affecting ToF are worse in RToF due to twice the distance
- Time delay in transmitting response signal (depending on the receiver's electronics) adds to position estimation error
Phase of Arrival (PoA)
- Measures phase difference from transmission to reception
- Typically used in conjunction with other methods (RSSI, ToF, TDoA) to enhance localisation accuracy
- High accuracy is only achievable with direct line-of-sight
Localisation Technologies
| Technology | Range | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wifi 802.11 n/ac/ad | 35m | Widely available High accuracy Existing infrastructure |
Sensitive to noise Complex processing algorithms needed |
| Wifi 802.11 ah (new) | 1km | High coverage range Low power consumption |
New technology, not yet tested for indoor environments |
| Ultrawide Band (UWB) | 10-20m | Immune to interference High accuracy |
Short Range Additional hardware High cost |
| Radio Frequency Indentification Device (RFID) | 200m | Low power consumption High coverage range |
Low accuracy |
| Bluetooth | 100m | High throughput High coverage range Low power consumption |
Low accuracy Sensitive to noise |
| Ultrasound | <20m | Less absorption from obstacles | High dependence on sensor placement |
| Acoustics | <2m | High accuracy | Niche applications Sensitive to sound pollution Additional hardware/anchor points |
| Visible Light (LEDs) | 1.4km | Widely available High potential (with AoA technique) Multipath-free |
Requires Line-of-Sight Higher power consumption |